[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 4:20:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 4 April 2019 01:58:09 UTC+3, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:13:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:42:15 UTC+3, Samuel

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread Yagamy Light
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 01:58:09 UTC+3, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:13:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:42:15 UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 17:43:51 UTC+2, Yagamy Light a

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread John H Palmieri
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 3:13:43 PM UTC-7, Yagamy Light wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:42:15 UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 17:43:51 UTC+2, Yagamy Light a écrit : >>> >>> # Steps to reproduce (in terms of terminal comands: >>> >>> $ cat

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread Yagamy Light
On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 22:42:15 UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 17:43:51 UTC+2, Yagamy Light a écrit : >> >> # Steps to reproduce (in terms of terminal comands: >> >> $ cat sagemath_test.sage >> plot(graphs.HeawoodGraph()) >> $ sage >>

[sage-devel] Re: load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 17:43:51 UTC+2, Yagamy Light a écrit : > > # Steps to reproduce (in terms of terminal comands: > > $ cat sagemath_test.sage > plot(graphs.HeawoodGraph()) > $ sage > ┌┐ > │ SageMath

[sage-devel] load() function doesn't pop up a PNG viewer

2019-04-03 Thread Yagamy Light
# Steps to reproduce (in terms of terminal comands: $ cat sagemath_test.sage plot(graphs.HeawoodGraph()) $ sage ┌┐ │ SageMath version 8.7, Release Date: 2019-03-23 │ │ Using Python

AW:[sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread michi-j...@kabelmail.de
Thank you! I fixed it right away and commited a sage compilable version. Moreover, I added a jupyter example file (in german).Best regardsMichael Originalnachricht Betreff: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifoldsVon: Eric Gourgoulhon An: sage-devel Cc: Le mercredi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 13:38:17 UTC+2, Michael Jung a écrit : > > Okay, the code has been uploaded. :) > > Thanks! I found the reason. I am answering on the ticket. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread Michael Jung
Okay, the code has been uploaded. :) Am 03.04.19 um 13:12 schrieb Dima Pasechnik: On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:48 AM michi-j...@kabelmail.de wrote: Yes, I could. But it's not well documented yet. Should I add it anyway? as long as the ticket is not marked as "needs review", your branch there

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:48 AM michi-j...@kabelmail.de wrote: > > Yes, I could. But it's not well documented yet. Should I add it anyway? as long as the ticket is not marked as "needs review", your branch there can be WIP, why not? > > Best regards, > Michael > > > Originalnachricht

AW:[sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread michi-j...@kabelmail.de
Yes, I could. But it's not well documented yet. Should I add it anyway? Best regards,Michael Originalnachricht Betreff: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifoldsVon: Eric Gourgoulhon An: sage-devel Cc: Le mardi 2 avril 2019 22:54:51 UTC+2, Michael Jung a écrit :All fine,

[sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifolds

2019-04-03 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le mardi 2 avril 2019 22:54:51 UTC+2, Michael Jung a écrit : > > > All fine, except the very last line. The coercions are working quite well > so far - without any errors. Yet, what might explain the very different > results? Can you give me a first hint, though not seeing the code? > Well it's