Hi Eric,
On 2019-08-27, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> To avoid such mistake, you can run set_inverse() with the option
> verbose=True. Then the provided inverse transform is checked.
Is the option really called "verbose=True"? Not "check=True", like in
most other cases?
Best regards,
Simon
--
Y
Le mardi 27 août 2019 16:51:20 UTC+2, Andreas Hermann a écrit :
>
> I am sorry, but this is a stupid mistake. The function defined via
> set_inverse() is not the inverse function since the first entry of atan2 is
> by definition the y-coordinate. If one swaps u and v in atan2 then
> everything i
El martes, 27 de agosto de 2019, 16:25:12 (UTC+2), Victor Shoup escribió:
>
> I reviewed some comments which mentioned a problem with ntl and threads.
> I’m happy to fix that, but I don’t think I understand what the issue is.
> Can anyone explain? Thanks.
Hi Victor,
IIRC I reported this to y
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 10:40:53 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
>
> and as a row-sparse list presentation:
>
> sage: %time v=[(i,j,1) for i in [0..1429] for j in [0..82]]
> CPU times: user 96.9 ms, sys: 13.2 ms, total: 110 ms
> Wall time: 105 ms
> sage: %time v={(i,j):1 for i in [0..1429] f
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 9:29:31 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:19 PM Frédéric Chapoton > wrote:
> >
> > I can create a ticket, but I would like first to be sure that is a real
> issue.
>
> Do you have any previous benchmarks to compare it to? Even if you
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 3:19 PM Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> I can create a ticket, but I would like first to be sure that is a real issue.
Do you have any previous benchmarks to compare it to? Even if you
think, for some reason (?) that it's "too slow" I don't know that it's
that meaningful a s
I am sorry, but this is a stupid mistake. The function defined via
set_inverse() is not the inverse function since the first entry of atan2 is
by definition the y-coordinate. If one swaps u and v in atan2 then
everything is fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:25 Victor Shoup, wrote:
> I reviewed some comments which mentioned a problem with ntl and threads.
> I’m happy to fix that, but I don’t think I understand what the issue is.
> Can anyone explain?
if NTL is built with multithreading then it does not link in the
correspondi
I reviewed some comments which mentioned a problem with ntl and threads. I’m
happy to fix that, but I don’t think I understand what the issue is. Can anyone
explain? Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from th
I can create a ticket, but I would like first to be sure that is a real
issue.
Frédéric
Le lundi 26 août 2019 11:29:44 UTC+2, Simon King a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> did someone open a ticket for that issue?
>
> Best regards,
> Simon
>
>
> On 2019-08-24, Nils Bruin > wrote:
> > It seems to be
10 matches
Mail list logo
