On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:10 PM chris wuthrich
wrote:
>
>
> I have a question about the future of srange under python 3, which changes
> the behaviour of range. Probably this has been discussed before but I could
> not find it.
>
> In 9.0.beta10 we have
>
> sage: range(1,3)
> range(1, 3)
> sage
Why? Because it is possible. And the OS Raspbian is distributed with a
version of Mathematica 12.0
First attempt was building sage-8.9. Just did a 'make' after downloading.
The RPi 4 showed unstable.
The little computer stalled a few times. Power off and power on. After 12
hours there was a run
Hoi Jaap,
it's interesting to dig more into these segfaults, they might be due
to Rasberry Pi CPU being ARM,
and we didn't test Sage on ARM for the last 4-5 years.
Dima
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:17 PM Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Why? Because it is possible. And the OS Raspbian is distributed with a
Mon 2019-12-30 15:24:59 UTC, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> Hoi Jaap,
>
> it's interesting to dig more into these segfaults, they might be due
> to Rasberry Pi CPU being ARM,
> and we didn't test Sage on ARM for the last 4-5 years.
>
In fact our download site has an arm section:
http://file
This pull request from last week on the pexpect repo
has the news that Travis-CI added ARM64 support.
- ARM64: Add ARM64 jobs in Travis-CI
https://github.com/pexpect/pexpect/pull/612
See the recent Travis-CI blog posts about arm support
(October 2019) and Power support (December 2019).
- Multi
I did not been pay close attention to the details of working with the develop
tree and other repositories, and have a question:
I would like to be able to clone an earlier sage release than what’s at the
top of the tree. After poking the documentation, I think this would clone the
previous re
On 12/30/19 3:33 PM, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel wrote:
> I did not been pay close attention to the details of working with the develop
> tree and other repositories, and have a question:
>
> I would like to be able to clone an earlier sage release than what’s at the
> top of the tree. A
On 12/20/19 10:57 AM, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> I found .spkg archives (which are essentially just zipfiles, or
> tarballs, I forget which, containing the upstream sources along with
> some Sage-specific stuff) for 0.3, 0.3.1, and 0.3.2 if you want them.
> But perhaps it's not even terribly meani
Hi Dima,
I don't understand what I see and I hate that. Seeing 4 CPU's producing
heat, four instances of python 3 gathering CPU time.
producing 0 test of 0.00s duration. There is something not OK in the
Raspberry Pi system.
I don't trust the memory management system at all.
make ptestlong ended
For what it's worth, I regularly build and test sage-on-nixos on aarch64.
The testsuite shows no issues, except some transient timeouts which may or
may not be caused by the architecture.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubs
I'm trying to build sage 9.0.rc1 for conda. For conda what I do is I run,
1. Run configure
2. cp src/bin/* to /bin
3. cp src/ext/* to /share/sage/ext
4. run `python setup.py install` in src
This has worked fine until 8.9
In 9.0 some scripts in `src/bin/` use `sage-system-python` which is in
`buil
11 matches
Mail list logo
