Thank you very much Dima!
Now it works, though it has taken a little bit...
(...)
Testing that Sage starts...
[2020-01-23 21:50:42] SageMath version 9.0, Release Date: 2020-01-01
Yes, Sage starts.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/paulo/sage-9.0/build/make'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pa
It depends on the fortran name mangling. For gfortran, one symbol would be
dgeqrf_.
Isuru
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:05 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:36 PM Antonio Rojas wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > El jueves, 23 de enero de 2020, 18:11:51 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik
> escribió:
>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:36 PM Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>
>
> El jueves, 23 de enero de 2020, 18:11:51 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:20 PM Isuru Fernando wrote:
>> >
>> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion blas
>> > 0.3.7
>> > [root@50586643ff22 /]#
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:47 PM Paulo Manuel de Barros Correia
wrote:
>
> I was just trying to install version 9.0 from source and then with make I got
> the error about mpir.
> I followed your suggestion and installed all the packages there indicated.
> But the result is the same...
after all th
I was just trying to install version 9.0 from source and then with make I
got the error about mpir.
I followed your suggestion and installed all the packages there indicated.
But the result is the same...
quinta-feira, 23 de Janeiro de 2020 às 16:36:39 UTC, Dima Pasechnik
escreveu:
>
> Is there
El jueves, 23 de enero de 2020, 18:11:51 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió:
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:20 PM Isuru Fernando > wrote:
> >
> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion blas
> > 0.3.7
> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion cblas
> > 3.9.0
> > [root@50586643
> One way to do this is to test openblas for a symbol that is on Arch
in cblas, not in openblas,
I'm not sure I understand. Are you asking for a symbol in libcblas.so that
is not in an libopenblas.so compiled with CBLAS?
> Could someone figure out these symbols, or give me access to an Arch box?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:11 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:20 PM Isuru Fernando wrote:
> >
> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion blas
> > 0.3.7
> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion cblas
> > 3.9.0
> > [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversi
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:20 PM Isuru Fernando wrote:
>
> [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion blas
> 0.3.7
> [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion cblas
> 3.9.0
> [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion lapack
> 3.9.0
> [root@50586643ff22 /]# pkg-config --modversion open
Is there a reason for you to build MPIR/GMP rather than use one a from
(apparently) a Linux system?
It might be much easier to install a system GMP package and use it
rather than trying to dig up the issue at hand.
Please see
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html#linux-recomme
OK, everything worked fine this time. Dima, thanks very much for your help!
-Jeremy
On 1/22/20 11:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jeremy Martin wrote:
Same problem after running .configure and make. Again, it breaks while trying
to build brial. New log attached
Nils Bruin wrote:
> I don't think that for any non-trivial applications generic code is
> going to perform properly for both exact and non-exact base rings, but
> actually the equality choice that has been made, allows the heuristic
> approach: start with very high precision or double the precision
Nils Bruin wrote:
> I think the only choice (if any) is to match the occurrence of a name
> in the smallest ring.
>
> If your generic code is relying on coercion in a setting where name
> matching like this is relevant, I suspect it's almost certainly the
> wrong choice.
I think we agree. To clar
Hello,
When making sage 9.0 I receive the following error message:
(...)
get_d.c: In function '__gmpn_get_d':
get_d.c:125:34: error: storage size of 'u' isn't known
union ieee_double_extract u;
^
Makefile:462: recipe for target 'get_d.lo' failed
make[6]:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 2:07:18 PM UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
>
> [re-posting a reply from a week ago that apparently did not go through
> because gmane was moving]
>
> Nils Bruin wrote:
> > This model has the advantage that (sqrt(1+t)^2 -1)/t == 1 returns
> > true, as one would
15 matches
Mail list logo
