[sage-devel] Re: pari-seadata

2020-09-02 Thread John Cremona
Referring to http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/packages.html there are three versions and the larger the version you have, the larger finite fields will be supported. The small one "should be suitable for fields up to 350 bits", the standard one "covers finite fields of cardinality q up to 750 b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pari-seadata

2020-09-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:39 AM John Cremona wrote: > > Referring to > http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/packages.html > there are three versions and the larger the version you have, the larger > finite fields will be supported. The small one "should be suitable for > fields up to 350 bits", the s

[sage-devel] Sage with system brial

2020-09-02 Thread Steven Trogdon
Is it possible to build Sage using ones system brial? I have ./configure --with-system-brial=yes LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed --no-create --no-recursion and then from config.log ## -- ## ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG bria

[sage-devel] Re: Sage with system brial

2020-09-02 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Use "make brial-clean" to uninstall the spkg. On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 11:29:21 AM UTC-7, Steven Trogdon wrote: > > Is it possible to build Sage using ones system brial? I have > > ./configure --with-system-brial=yes LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed > --no-create --no-recursion > > and t

[sage-devel] Re: Sage with system brial

2020-09-02 Thread Steven Trogdon
Thanks much. I knew there should be something simple. On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 12:34:20 PM UTC-6, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Use "make brial-clean" to uninstall the spkg. > > On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 11:29:21 AM UTC-7, Steven Trogdon wrote: >> >> Is it possible to build Sage us

[sage-devel] Re: Transition from jupyter notebook to jupyterlab

2020-09-02 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Thanks to Joshua Campbell's work in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30246, the current beta (9.2.beta11) has a fully functional JupyterLab as an optional package - including interacts. This could use broader testing now. See https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2#IPython.2C_Jupyter_no

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Transition from jupyter notebook to jupyterlab

2020-09-02 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2020-08-03 00:22 UTC, Matthias Koeppe: > > Thanks to Joshua Campbell's work in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30246 > the current beta (9.2.beta11) has a fully functional > JupyterLab as an optional package - including interacts. Wonderful. > This could use broader testing now. See > https://

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Transition from jupyter notebook to jupyterlab

2020-09-02 Thread Jason Grout
Hi everyone, First, it's really great to post here again :). Sorry I didn't see this thread earlier, but thanks to the recent activity it surfaced again in my inbox. I really love seeing the discussion here! Feel free to reach out to ping me or other JupyterLab developers on topics like this. Dis

[sage-devel] Re: What should Sage import by default?

2020-09-02 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Perhaps it makes sense to keep "math related" imports given that we have a bunch of other "math functionality" available without extra imports and that's the point of Sage in general. While stuff for dealing with files and warnings is special enough to require special commands. On Wednesday, 2