Running ./bootstrap on macOS 10.15.6 with Homebrew, my student gets
...
src/doc/bootstrap:56: installing src/doc/en/installation/homebrew.txt
and src/doc/en/installation/homebrew-optional.txt
src/doc/bootstrap:65: installing src/doc/en/reference/spkg/*.rst
src/doc/bootstrap:97: installing src/do
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:22 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Running ./bootstrap on macOS 10.15.6 with Homebrew, my student gets
>
> ...
> src/doc/bootstrap:56: installing src/doc/en/installation/homebrew.txt
> and src/doc/en/installation/homebrew-optional.txt
>
> src/doc/bootstrap:65: installing sr
Dear all,
vdelecroix schrieb am Freitag, 16. Oktober 2020 um 07:50:46 UTC+2:
> I agree that these are not fields in the mathematical sense. And Sage
> knows about it
>
> sage: RR.is_exact()
>
>
> False
> sage: QQ.is_exact()
>
>
> True
>
That's actually what I meant. We also have:
sage: RR
-1: I don't really care what RealField.__repr__ returns, but cast a token
no vote to object to the logical next move of breaking backwards
compatibility by changing the meaning of RealField and/or RR. I see the
need for a "genuine real field", but it seems a lot simpler just to call it
somethi