[sage-devel] serious time loss in pari interface

2021-02-03 Thread John Cremona
I was looking again at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25934 and now think that the issue is more serious than first suggested. The immediate problem noticed was that after defining a sextic field and creating the unit ideal, it took a very long time to display, and the discussion side-tracked on

[sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

2021-02-03 Thread John H Palmieri
Right, thank you. Python 3.9 builds successfully. On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 7:14:29 PM UTC-8 zsc...@gmail.com wrote: > For the --with-system-python3=no, I don't know what the problem is but I > think it was fixed by upgrading to python 3.9 in > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30589 > > On

[sage-devel] sage -b is broken

2021-02-03 Thread John H Palmieri
I'm not sure when it happened, but with the latest beta, I see % ./sage -b Makefile:25: *** This Makefile needs to be invoked by build/make/install. Stop. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop r

Re: [sage-devel] sage -b is broken

2021-02-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
finally :-) (not sure bug or feature) well, make build works On Wed, 3 Feb 2021, 17:05 John H Palmieri, wrote: > I'm not sure when it happened, but with the latest beta, I see > > % ./sage -b > Makefile:25: *** This Makefile needs to be invoked by build/make/install. > Stop. > > -- > You rece

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

2021-02-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021, 17:03 John H Palmieri, wrote: > Right, thank you. Python 3.9 builds successfully. > > On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 7:14:29 PM UTC-8 zsc...@gmail.com wrote: > >> For the --with-system-python3=no, I don't know what the problem is but I >> think it was fixed by upgrading to pyt

Re: [sage-devel] serious time loss in pari interface

2021-02-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
we have a ticket to upgrade Pari to the latest version, 2.13, but it needs work. On Wed, 3 Feb 2021, 14:11 John Cremona, wrote: > I was looking again at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25934 and now > think that the issue is more serious than first suggested. The > immediate problem noticed w

Re: [sage-devel] serious time loss in pari interface

2021-02-03 Thread John Cremona
As someone remarked on that ticket, the problem has gone away between 9.2 and current beta, presumably due to an upgrade to cypari, so this can be ignored. On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 5:13:36 PM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote: > we have a ticket to upgrade Pari to the latest version, 2.13, but

Re: [sage-devel] sage -b is broken

2021-02-03 Thread dmo...@deductivepress.ca
I believe this was fixed by gh-kliem in trac #31263. On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 10:08:45 AM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > finally :-) (not sure bug or feature) > > well, > > make build > > works > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021, 17:05 John H Palmieri, wrote: > >> I'm not sure when it happened, bu

[sage-devel] Introducing gappy

2021-02-03 Thread E. Madison Bray
Hi all, I'm far enough along in its development that I'm happy to announce the creation of gappy [1], a new Python interface to GAP with no dependencies on Sage. It is based on Sage's own sage.libs.gap package, but with a few possible advantages: * Having no heavy-weight Sage dependencies, it sh

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

2021-02-03 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
I am happy to mentor, but I am not sure I could take on being an admin this year (next year I could though). Best, Travis On Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 7:54:01 PM UTC+10 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear all, > > we are looking for projects and mentors for GSoC 2021. > > Myself, I'll pass this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

2021-02-03 Thread Zachary Scherr
I found something possibly relevant at https://bugs.python.org/issue42691 although there the complaint was that Homebrew built python against system tcl and the suggestion was that Homebrew use its own tcl-tk. It seems that Homebrew is correctly using its own tcl-tk since the line 5 libtcl8