I have prepared a major IPython/Jupyter upgrade, to be merged early in the
9.5 development series. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31280
This will need testing by people who are familiar with the Jupyter notebook
(I rarely use it).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 2:41:04 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> The discussion of semantic innovations for the parents seems like a
> distraction to me. Note that in Python, the distinction between the mutable
> and immutable version of a type is usually expressed by different types:
On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 5:07:09 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Monday, 9 August 2021 at 15:54:03 UTC-7 Michael Jung wrote:
>
>> I like the idea proposed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29101 (as
>> posted by Matthias). Namely, introducing the option mutable=False for
>> the element
On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 11:27:35 PM UTC-7 vdelecroix wrote:
>
> It could even be refined to
>
> with Immutable(V):
> # elements of V are now immutable by default
>
> But even then, some code elsewhere in sage might use the very same
> parent (eg ZZ^2 is unique). This parent might want
Le 11/08/2021 à 08:09, Nils Bruin a écrit :
On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 21:10:43 UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to add to all the ideas, what about using a with statement, eg:
with Immutable():
# the things Nils wishes were immutable are immutable by default here
That would
On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 21:10:43 UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Just to add to all the ideas, what about using a with statement, eg:
>
> with Immutable():
> # the things Nils wishes were immutable are immutable by default here
>
That would basically move the "unless otherwise
