On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:10:25 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> ... you can see it in top-level config.log (the following is what you see
> if openblas is accepted):
>
> ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG openblas... ##
> ##
My understanding is that the Sage-9.3 and Sage-9.4 binaries are broken
on a large number of machines due to an issue with how openblas was
built. You probably have to use a sage-9.2 docker container, or wait
for sage 9.5 to come out.
Somebody probably should have deleted all sage-9.3 and 9.4
Hi,
nose selftests are broken, networkx and cvxopt selftests are broken
because they still rely on nose (in Sage), while upstream now relies
on pytest. Symengine does not rely on nose (nor pytest), but on cmake.
- fix for cvxopt: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32598 (needs_review)
- fix for
The above error message has been obtained by clicking on the Binder button
in the notebook
https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/sagemanifolds/SageManifolds/blob/master/Notebooks/SM_basic_Schwarzschild.ipynb
Le jeudi 30 septembre 2021 à 11:03:07 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
> The full error
The full error message is
Launching server...
Launch attempt 1 failed, retrying...
Launch attempt 2 failed, retrying...
Launch attempt 3 failed, retrying...
Internal Server Error
Le jeudi 30 septembre 2021 à 10:50:23 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Apart from Sage's Docker image
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:50 AM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apart from Sage's Docker image being still stuck to 9.3.beta8 (issue
> discussed at
> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/fUpSEHwR5VQ/m/YVmsBSOyCAAJ), a
> new issue has appeared: one cannot run Sage at all in Binder, even
Hi,
Apart from Sage's Docker image being still stuck to 9.3.beta8 (issue
discussed at
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/fUpSEHwR5VQ/m/YVmsBSOyCAAJ), a new
issue has appeared: one cannot run Sage at all in Binder, even with the
9.3.beta8 image. Every attempt fails at the "Launching
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:02 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:09:07 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> One guess would be that ./configure found what it thought was a usable
>> installation of openblas, but when gsl tried to build, that openblas was
>> not in
