Because sage 9.8.beta7 (more specifically, #34547) breaks emacs'
sage-shell-mode, I would like to know whether there are any other emacs
users out there. Are there alternatives to sage-shell-mode?
Best wishes,
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 13:17, 'Martin R' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Because sage 9.8.beta7 (more specifically, #34547) breaks emacs'
> sage-shell-mode, I would like to know whether there are any other emacs
> users out there. Are there alternatives to sage-shell-mode?
I noticed that our instructions to install jupyter kernels have fallen out
of date a bit. It refers to the instructions available on
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/launching.html#setting-up-sagemath-as-a-jupyter-kernel-in-an-existing-jupyter-notebook-or-jupyterlab-installation
in
That's already fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34756
On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 1:27:59 PM UTC-8 Nils Bruin wrote:
> I noticed that our instructions to install jupyter kernels have fallen out
> of date a bit. It refers to the instructions available on
>
>
> https://doc.sagemath.o
There are duplicates of the same comments. See many comments below from
https://34.105.185.241/sagemath/sage-all-2023-01-14-012/issues/34909#issuecomment-4477657
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and s
I may have forgotten to run clear out the previous migration archive on
this test import.
A new test import will be ready in a bit, I'll post the link when it's
ready.
On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 3:52:11 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> There are duplicates of the same comments. See many comme
The latest iteration:
https://34.105.185.241/sagemath/sage-all-2023-01-14-013/issues
(with some refinements on labels).
On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 4:30:08 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> I may have forgotten to run clear out the previous migration archive on
> this test import.
> A new t
I am not sure if the "/ 1", "/ 2", "/ 3", "/ 4", "/ 5" postfixes are really
helpful. Note that
(1) As Matthias noticed, the priority labels are sorted in the correct
order without those prefixes.
(2) The label text and the label color already indicate the priority.
(3) The numeral postfix is so
