If you want to see the current candidates right away, see this
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35750#issuecomment-1603286599
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 7:43:48 AM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While discussions on modularization efforts are on going, we are working on
> providing
Hi,
While discussions on modularization efforts are on going, we are working on
providing block-scoped optional tag in
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35750
but we didn't come to an agreement on the keyword triggering optional
tests, to be used instead of "optional" (we did agree on
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 2:15 PM Michael Orlitzky
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:56 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > (5) provide a WebAssembly option
> >
> > WebAssembly is typically about half the speed as native code (at best),
> but
> > it is highly cross platform and self contained.
Well, concerns of software integration and deployment have always been part
of the Sage project. And several leading projects in scientific python have
already invested in WebAssembly deployment, at least for its obvious uses
in providing interactive documentation. I, for one, welcome our new
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:56 -0700, William Stein wrote:
>
> (5) provide a WebAssembly option
>
> WebAssembly is typically about half the speed as native code (at best), but
> it is highly cross platform and self contained. WebAssembly is difficult
> mainly when you have to deal with the OS
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:44 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 12:49:29 PM UTC-7 Francesco Biscani wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 02:02, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> building binary wheels to be distributed on PyPI (in addition to the
source distributions) will be one
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 12:49:29 PM UTC-7 Francesco Biscani wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 02:02, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
building binary wheels to be distributed on PyPI (in addition to the source
distributions) will be one of the key steps in order to make it very
user-friendly -- i.e.,
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 02:02, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 4:40:06 PM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> Pip [...] can't do anything with the non-python software on which sage
> subsists.
> To make sage-via-pip work, we'll have to maintain a new pseudo-
> distribution on
