Re: [sage-devel] ping - please cast you vote: VOTE: Follow NEP 29: Recommended Python version

On Thursday, 6 July 2023 at 23:25:12 UTC+2 Nils Bruin wrote: It looks to me proposal 1 still doesn't make it *mandatory* to drop support outside of the NEP29-defined version window. It seems to me that it just defines when a support-drop PR becomes acceptable to merge, and that such a PR would

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

Simpler testcase is to replace `C = sqrt(T2)` with `C=SR(int(2)).sqrt()` Both int() and sqrt() appear necessary, sin() doesn't leak for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

Nils, This is my recommendation to avoid my worst-case scenario, where someone must go to some far away basement and power cycle the server manually after waiting a couple of days for OOM kicking in. I'm okay with a user using 90% of the ram, if that becomes an issue, I can always email them or ki

[sage-devel] Re: Import module error when building documentation

Matthias, So we should Merge your PR into the code for our PR and then merge this into our PR? brett On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 9:12:36 PM UTC-4 brettpim wrote: > > Thanks Matthias! > brett > On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 5:14:34 PM UTC-4 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> It's a bug in the CI scr

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 07:53:22 UTC-7 Edgar Costa wrote: I'm okay with a user using 90% of the ram, if that becomes an issue, I can always email them or kill their process, but more often than not, until I started to use earlyoom is that the memory usage slowly creeps to 100% and the culprit

[sage-devel] Re: Import module error when building documentation

That's right. If you are using the GH cli, that's "gh pr checkout 35865 && git checkout - && git merge -" On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:55:32 AM UTC-7 brettpim wrote: > Matthias, > So we should Merge your PR into the code for our PR and then merge this > into our PR? > brett > > On Thursday, J

Re: [sage-devel] Memory leak (quite bad)

Two users try to use 51% of the memory simultaneously. On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:01 AM Nils Bruin wrote: > On Friday, 7 July 2023 at 07:53:22 UTC-7 Edgar Costa wrote: > > I'm okay with a user using 90% of the ram, if that becomes an issue, I can > always email them or kill their process, but mor

[sage-devel] Voting result: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

Hi, The voting in https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/8KZNRBs6F6U is closed. There were 13 votes. The vote tally is as follows: (A) "needs": 10 (B) "requires": 1 (C) "uses": 2 (D) "standard": 0 The clear winner is (A). Hence "needs" will be used as the keyword for block-scoped tag for opt

[sage-devel] Re: Voting result: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

Note that the issue #35750 is resolved by the PR at https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35749. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubs

[sage-devel] Re: Voting result: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

Thanks all for voting, and thanks Kwankyu for organizing the referendum! Matthias On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > The voting in https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/8KZNRBs6F6U is > closed. There were 13 votes. The vote tally is as follows: > > (A) "

[sage-devel] Re: Modularization project: II. The tools

On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 9:51:05 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: - #35790: Doctest # optional / # long / # needs annotation maintenance tool This is now ready for review. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-devel] Re: Modularization project: II. The tools

On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 9:51:05 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: Some new Issues / PRs to improve the tools: Codeblock-scoped # optional annotations for doctests (modularization) #35750 #35790: Doctest # optional / # long / # needs annotation

[sage-devel] import gc; from sage.all import SR; fails on python 3.11 and sage 9.6

On sage 9.6 and python 3.11: >>> import gc >>> from sage.all import SR Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/sage/all.py", line 127, in from sage.data_structures.all import * File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/sage/data_