On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:54 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Do you have exactly one (or at most) relation for any pair of variables? Can
> one have i=j ?
>
> Or it's the notation which should be improved?
>
The number of relations for a pair of variables can be arbitrary.
i=j appears irrelevant,
I apologize for this. No idea how sage snuck into the addressing.
> On Jan 31, 2024, at 16:24 , 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel
> wrote:
>
> A quick read, about using ChatGPT (or LLM-based AI) to assist in teaching
> Calculus to undergrads (or, as my dad used to call it “pouring electricity
On 31 January 2024 16:42:39 GMT, Georgi Guninski wrote:
>This is based on numerical experiments in sage.
>
>Let $K$ be a ring and define the ideal where each polynomial
>is of the form $(a_i x_i+b_i)(a_j x_j+b_j)=0$ for constant $a_i,b_i,a_j,b_j$.
Do you have exactly one (or at most) relation
This is based on numerical experiments in sage.
Let $K$ be a ring and define the ideal where each polynomial
is of the form $(a_i x_i+b_i)(a_j x_j+b_j)=0$ for constant $a_i,b_i,a_j,b_j$.
>Q1 Is it true that for constraints of this form the groebner basis is
>efficiently computable?
By "efficie
On 25/01/2024 7:06, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
Hi,
Our developer guide dictates to write Sphinx directives in
upper case. So for example, ".. MATH::" instead of ".. math::".
By the way, it seems that Sphinx community seems to regard low
