On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 3:18:06 AM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 18:21:04 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit :
You may recall that we use jupyterlab_mathjax2 because of the discussion
in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36129#issuecomment-1729218062
I've filed https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/4262/
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:14 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:12 PM Oscar Benjamin
> wrote:
>
>> Maxima's simplify_sum function produces something similar looking:
>>
>> (%i4) load("simplify_sum");
>> (%o4)
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 6:12 PM Oscar Benjamin
wrote:
> Maxima's simplify_sum function produces something similar looking:
>
> (%i4) load("simplify_sum");
> (%o4) "/usr/share/maxima/5.45.1/share/solve_rec/simplify_sum.mac"
>
> (%i5) sum(1/factorial(n^2), n, 1, inf), simpsum;
> (%o5)
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 18:21:04 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit :
You may recall that we use jupyterlab_mathjax2 because of the discussion
in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36129#issuecomment-1729218062
Thanks for reminding me about this. Then I guess the question is: why
Maxima's simplify_sum function produces something similar looking:
(%i4) load("simplify_sum");
(%o4) "/usr/share/maxima/5.45.1/share/solve_rec/simplify_sum.mac"
(%i5) sum(1/factorial(n^2), n, 1, inf), simpsum;
(%o5) 'sum(1/(n^2)!,n,1,inf)
(%i6) simplify_sum(%);
1/'product(n^2+%,%,1,2*n+1)
It appears to come from Maxima, but I have trouble reproducing this in
Maxima.
Perhaps it's a bug in the Maxima interface?
Is there a direct way to see how Maxima is called in this instance?
Dima
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:53 PM Georgi Guninski wrote:
> There is discussion about this on
You may recall that we use jupyterlab_mathjax2 because of the discussion
in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36129#issuecomment-1729218062
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 8:04:30 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:09:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:09:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
The partial conclusion is thus:
- Sage 10.2 uses Ubuntu 22.04's MathJax (v2.7.9), so there is no issue when
the computer is offline.
- for some reason, Sage 10.3.beta* refuses to use Ubuntu 22.04's MathJax
and the
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:39:05 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit :
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 10:55:41 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully
That's why we should just stop shipping jupyterlab, and instead use one offered
by the OS or some other standard Jupyter way.
Here we are trying to solve already solved problems, what's the point of it?
On 14 February 2024 14:39:05 GMT, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
>On Wednesday, February 14, 2024
On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 10:55:41 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully
installed in the Sage tree during the install of Sage 10.3.beta*, cf.
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
More precisely, the Ubuntu 22.04's libjs-mathjax is version 2.7.9.
When the computer is online and I right-click on "About MathJax" in a
displayed cell, I get "MathJax v2.7.7", which is not the system version...
If I do
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully
installed in the Sage tree during the install of Sage 10.3.beta*, cf. the
attached log (SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/mathjax-3.2.0.log),
Well, maybe not:
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:18:20 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It
might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically
Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It
might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically
loaded from the net.
The Ubuntu packages libjs-mathjax and fonts-mathjax are
For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It might
be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically loaded from
the net.
On 14 February 2024 12:47:52 GMT, Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>While working on a Sage 10.3.beta notebook in a train
The "math" activity might be useful, but the "documentation" label is
currently also used for issues that have nothing to do with math. So
either relabel those or exclude "documentation".
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 at 08:34:32 UTC+1 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 3:42:55
Hi,
While working on a Sage 10.3.beta notebook in a train without any internet
connection, I've noticed that there is no LaTeX rendering via MathJax,
neither in the markdown cells nor in the output cells within the scope of
%display latex. There is no such issue with Sage 10.2 and I've
Thank you! To get a working prototype for the functional equations solver,
the coercion issue with tensors is the most interesting issue.
I am already quite happy that it works with symmetric functions in one
variable!
Apart from technicalities, it might then be interesting to explore whether
19 matches
Mail list logo
