Re: [sage-devel] Re: Memory leak in |EllipticCurve([n,0]).root_number()| and problem in algebraic geometry

2024-08-31 Thread Georgi Guninski
>As well, with cypari, a call to pari.getheap() adds 1 object there, a bug, I guess. >(this does not happen with cypari2) >In [14]: pari.getheap() >Out[14]: [334, 163655741] >In [15]: pari.getheap() >Out[15]: [335, 163655758] I can't reproduce this on 10.4: sage: s=pari.getheap() sage: fo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Memory leak in |EllipticCurve([n,0]).root_number()| and problem in algebraic geometry

2024-08-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 4:35 AM Marc Culler wrote: > > As Dima says, and as the issue he mentions supports, the current cypari2 code > which attempts to keep Pari Gens on the Pari stack as much as possible is > badly broken. There are many situations where Python Gen objects cannot be > garbag

Re: [sage-devel] Automatic beta release

2024-08-31 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 20:26 -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > What do you think? Why not do what everyone else does, and let developers merge PRs into the "develop" branch when they're approved? Waiting only causes merge conflicts. The release manager could still cherry-pick commits for betas, relea