On a Lenovo ThinkPad with an up to date Manjaro Linux OS and Sage 9.2
successfully compiled from source I failed to
install gap_packages-4.10.2.p1, while many other optional packages (like
the huge cbc) installed perfectly. Below I append the (hopefully) relevant
piece of the log file.
-- Pet
I'm sorry if the following is more appropriate for sage-support. I just
tried to follow the first few steps from the Developer's Guide v9.2. From
that I would have expected that after running "git clone
git://github.com/sagemath/sage.git" I would find two branches of the source
code, namely sag
Still in SageMath version 9.3.rc5, the call "PrimitiveGroup(2500, 1)"
raises a "NotImplementedError: Only the primitive groups of degree less
than 2500 are available in GAP's database", even though the primitive
groups are available up to degree 4095.
The exception is raised by the wrong degree
ady a trac ticket opened about
> that?
>
> Vincent
>
> Le 03/05/2021 à 17:53, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel a écrit :
> > Still in SageMath version 9.3.rc5, the call "PrimitiveGroup(2500, 1)"
> > raises a "NotImplementedError: Only the primiti
The following lines do what is to be expected:
sage: g = SymmetricGroup(3)
: u = g.subgroup([])
: x1 = u.trivial_character().induct(g)
: dummy = g.conjugacy_classes_subgroups()
: x2 = u.trivial_character().induct(g)
: print(x1 == x2)
: print(x1.scalar_product(x1))
: pri
The method representative_action() for Sage permutation groups erroneously
returns the identity element when it actually should either fail or return
something which makes clear if no representative exists. The corresponding
method for libgap groups behaves as expected:
sage: g = PermutationGr
The following code raises a SingularError in SageMath version 10.4.beta3
(with system singular enabled), and the same at
https://sagecell.sagemath.org/ :
R. = QQ[]
f = -2*x^2*y^2 - x^3 - x^2*y + x*y^2 + y^3 + 2*x^2 + 2*y^2 - 2
C = Curve(f)
assert C.genus() == 0
print(C.rational_parameterization(
I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the
explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an up to date arch
linux machine ignores the installed singular (`pacman -Q singular` returns
`singular 4.3.2.p16-1`). Not sure if it is a path problem that makes the
conf
am Freitag, 19. April 2024 um 12:08:01 UTC+2:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:13AM -0700, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
> wrote:
> > I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the
> > explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an u
Dima Pasechnik schrieb am Samstag, 20. April 2024 um 17:57:05 UTC+2:
[...] well, this looks relevant. "any of gmp ntl flint readline mpfr
cddlib is installed as or will be installed as SPKG"
these are Singular's dependencies, and possibly not all of them are on your
OS.
In particular, flint is
R. = GF(2)[]
L = [a^2+a, b^2+b]
I = ideal(L)
V = I.variety(algorithm='msolve', proof=False)
raises a `ValueError: positive-dimensional ideal`, which of course is
nonsense. Exporting the system to an msolve-readable file and using msolve
directly (with the -P 2 flag) returns the correct result.
the `enter` key after the
`cat` command in the console.
-- Peter Mueller
Marc Mezzarobba schrieb am Sonntag, 30. Juni 2024 um 09:04:28 UTC+2:
> 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel wrote:
> > R. = GF(2)[]
> > L = [a^2+a, b^2+b]
> > I = ideal(L)
> > V = I.variety(alg
both
cases. Still, from within Sage, I get the wrong result. So I guess I need
to force Sage to use the system msolve rather the one which Sage built
during installation.
-- Peter Mueller
Marc Mezzarobba schrieb am Sonntag, 30. Juni 2024 um 12:27:25 UTC+2:
> 'Peter Mueller' via sag
The line `R. = QQbar[]; factor(a^2 - 2*c^2)` raises a
ValueError: variable name '@c' is not alphanumeric
while the same line with `c` replaced with `b` works fine.
This happens in a local installation of Sage 10.4 (and 10.5.beta0), but
also on the SageCell.
-- Peter Mueller
--
You received t
14 matches
Mail list logo
