Hello all,
Christian Kuper noted that the critical_points() function of
PiecewisePolynomial depended on the variable involved.
He then noticed that other functions also depended on the variable. I went
through the code and fixed all the variable dependence, with the exception
of the convolution fu
I reproduced this in sage 4.8, but with different results:
sage: f(x) = sin(x)^2/x^2
sage: f.integral(x, -5, 5).n()
-0.20071537570
sage: f.integral(x, -500, 500).n()
-2.0008410959e-7
sage: f.integral(x, -5, 5).n()
-2.109169e-9
The answer seems t
I reproduced this in sage 4.8, but with different results:
sage: f(x) = sin(x)^2/x^2
sage: f.integral(x, -5, 5).n()
-0.20071537570
sage: f.integral(x, -500, 500).n()
-2.0008410959e-7
sage: f.integral(x, -5, 5).n()
-2.109169e-9
The answer seems t
I am very interested as well. I'd be happy to help with anything. I
would also like to be CC'd (afleckenstein) on any ticket you create.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 06:30 -0700, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 9, 2012 7:07:14 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
> I think it would be of gene
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:55 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
> > It does suggest we may want to consider reseting Maxima's counter for
> > dummy variables before calling solve. RJF, how does one do that in
> > Maxima?
>
> I'm fairly sure that would lead to bugs.
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 22:41 +, Evans Doe Ocansey wrote:
> Dear all,
> I was installing SAGE on an acer laptop on ubuntu 11.04 platform and
> got the this error after the installation. To see the error, I click
> on the link to download the install.log file.
>
> http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/s
