Hello Miguel,
I saw this discussion on Twitter and joined just to reply. From the
Asociación Python España we would love to help, so please let me know if we
can help you get in touch with the sponsors, spread the word... If you
want, when the details are ready you can publish an article here
Hello everyone: I read this announcement and I decided to help testing
the new notebook, but I must have done something wrong because it
doesn't work.
The problem is: I read the installation guide in
https://code.google.com/r/rkirov-flask/
and typed
sage -b main
as stated in
http://www.sag
..
On Mar 6, 3:54 pm, Juanlu001 wrote:
> Hello everyone: I read this announcement and I decided to help testing
> the new notebook, but I must have done something wrong because it
> doesn't work.
>
> The problem is: I read the installation guide
> inhttps://code.googl
Changed. My apologies again.
On Mar 6, 3:58 pm, Juanlu001 wrote:
> Sorry, I think I clicked the wrong button to write a new post... damn
> on me.
>
> I wanted to respond to this
> thread:http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/8bab6c...
>
> Can th
Just managed to install, I made an unknown mistake. Forget all what
I've said.
On Mar 6, 3:59 pm, Juanlu001 wrote:
> Changed. My apologies again.
>
> On Mar 6, 3:58 pm, Juanlu001 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sorry, I think I clicked the wrong button to wr
I just managed to install the new notebook, I am going to test it in
the following days. Thank you all for the efforts, the code needed
some care :)
On Feb 7, 10:27 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> We need people to test the new flask-based notebook that was done at the
> January Sage Days in Seattle (I
Just one silly bug, but when at first I open the page, I see "Error:
Username is not in the system" and "Error: Wrong password" in the
login form.
By the way, is https://code.google.com/r/rkirov-flask/ the source code
of this notebook? Should we test it locally in addition?
On Mar 26, 3:04 am, Wi
It seems to me that @interact plots in published worksheets don't work
(in fact, I just don't know if they have ever worked, I have never
published a worksheet)
Jason Grout's test worksheet shows it: http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/0/
On Mar 26, 3:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please fi
Yesterday I was playing with symbolic expressions, and I had to apply
divide_both_sides(), and I encountered something funny: you can divide
by zero (with a bit of care). To show this, I've taken the classic
"proof" and created a worksheet:
http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/65/
Though I have got u
Sounds like an interesting idea, specially the fact that you can see
each others code so you have a great opportunity to learn the
language. As they say in the FAQ, "From what we've seen, the tweaking
has made the contest more of a learning experience. ". It could also
be a good chance for finding
I have tested multiple interacts of mine and some computations, and
everything seems to work quite well except for the backslash \, which I
tried to use to split lines. It gives a syntax error:
SyntaxError Traceback (most recent call
last)SyntaxError: invalid synta
Yep, it seems they work now. Great!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sage
Sorry David, could you clarify what parts of Scipy do you think are a
disaster? Just for curiosity. I am a student and I am trying nowadays to use
these Python packages to perform numerical computations, and I am very
interested on what is being said in this thread.
--
To post to this group, s
13 matches
Mail list logo
