[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 released!

2010-03-10 Thread M. Yurko
On Mar 10, 4:01 am, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote: On 9 bře, 20:45, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20. Source tarball:

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-03 Thread M. Yurko
Thanks for the help. It works now. I probably would be good if it was found automatically. On Feb 2, 11:12 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:40 PM, M. Yurko wrote: For the simple example I just used pyximport. For the extension module I used

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 2, 6:44 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote: On 2 Feb., 21:26, Michael Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I've recently been building an extension module using both cython and numpy. It works fine with my system-wide install of python with numpy and cython

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
. The issue happens if the setup.py script uses either the original .pyx files or the generated .c files. On Feb 2, 9:33 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:11 PM, M. Yurko wrote: On Feb 2, 6:44 pm, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote: On 2

[sage-devel] Re: Issue with Sage, Cython, and Numpy

2010-02-02 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 2, 10:31 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote: On Feb 2, 2010, at 7:20 PM, M. Yurko wrote: The small example that I posted used pyximport. The extension module that made me originally see the issue was built with a setup.py distutils script. I have the same issue

[sage-devel] Re: Buffer types only allowed as function local variables

2010-01-18 Thread M. Yurko
Sorry about this. I meant to send this to the cython-users list. On Jan 18, 7:26 pm, Michael Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote: I've figured out what Dag meant in his original post. I've attached a quick example in case anyone else is having the same issue. -- Mike Yurko  cnp_tester.py

[sage-devel] View images from sage over ssh

2009-10-30 Thread M. Yurko
Hi all, I'm looking at a patch right now that changes graph layout and I have applied it to my install on sage.math. Is there anyway to see the image that is created when viewing a graph over ssh? Thanks, Michael Yurko --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group,

[sage-devel] Re: View images from sage over ssh

2009-10-30 Thread M. Yurko
(address='sage.math.washington.edu', accounts=True, secure=True, port=) where is an integer 1000 On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:18 AM, M. Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'm looking at a patch right now that changes graph layout and I have applied it to my install on sage.math

[sage-devel] Re: numerical integration

2009-10-27 Thread M. Yurko
I definitely like the ability to call different libraries with an algorithm argument. It would also be nice to include mpmath as an option since it support many different algorithms and arbitrary precision. On Oct 27, 5:05 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Writing some class

[sage-devel] Website, Trac etc. down

2009-10-01 Thread M. Yurko
Right now, it appears that the website, trac, the wiki, etc. are all down. Is everyone else having the same issue? -- Michael Yurko --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an

[sage-devel] Re: [femhub] some suggestions to web notebook

2009-09-24 Thread M. Yurko
That editor seemed as fast as the native text area to me. I am also using firefox 3.5.2 so it could be quite browser dependent. On Sep 24, 7:11 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote: Regarding syntax highlighting,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4 sources released

2009-03-12 Thread M. Yurko
I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on a Core 2 processor, and Sage 3.4 has failed to build for me twice on the same error. It appears to occur on the compilation of PolyBoRi and I get the following error: polybori/src/BoolePolynomial.cc:915: instantiated from here

[sage-devel] Re: #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-26 Thread M. Yurko
: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:52 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Feb 24, 7:17 pm, M. Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote: OK, upon further inspection, I realized that something must have gone wrong during the upgrade, so I''l just recompile from scratch again. The terminal when I launch

[sage-devel] #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-24 Thread M. Yurko
Using #auto to evaluate cells when the worksheets are opened still fails for me even after I upgraded to Sage 3.3. I did a quick search and found ticket 5020 relating to this issue, but it was supposedly merged in the first sage 3.3 Alpha. I am running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on a Core 2 Duo and my

[sage-devel] Re: #auto is still broken in Sage 3.3

2009-02-24 Thread M. Yurko
On Feb 24, 8:10 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, M. Yurko myu...@gmail.com wrote: Using #auto to evaluate cells when the worksheets are opened still fails for me even after I upgraded to Sage 3.3. I did a quick search and found ticket 5020 relating

[sage-devel] Minor typo in docs for zeta_zeros()

2008-06-13 Thread M. Yurko
In the reference manual (13.7 Tables of zeros of the Riemann-Zeta function) it states that zeta_zeros() gives a list of the first 1 imaginary parts. However, it should say first 10 imaginary parts (add a zero to read 100,000). Also, it might serve to mention that this is an optional