"under the weaker assumption of the base ring being a Q-algebra" -> "under the weaker assumption of the base ring's fraction field being a Q-algebra"Can someone please correct this for me and provide the links to the Trac server? I still don't have access. Thanks! :)Von meinem Huawei-Telefon gesend
Thank you! I fixed it right away and commited a sage compilable version. Moreover, I added a jupyter example file (in german).Best regardsMichael Originalnachricht Betreff: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifoldsVon: Eric Gourgoulhon An: sage-devel Cc: Le mercredi 3
Yes, I could. But it's not well documented yet. Should I add it anyway? Best regards,Michael Originalnachricht Betreff: [sage-devel] Re: Characteristic classes on manifoldsVon: Eric Gourgoulhon An: sage-devel Cc: Le mardi 2 avril 2019 22:54:51 UTC+2, Michael Jung a écrit :All fine,
Or, maybe, a better approach would be a direct manipulation via resu._name
and resu._latex_name.
However, I'm not familiar with the procedure. Furthermore, is this mailing
list right the place to discuss my written code?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Hey folks,
I'm pretty new to this, so please be patient.
During my developement of an implementation of characteristic classes of
the tangent bdl of manifolds, I've encountered a problem when wedging
unnamed differential forms on non-parallelizable manifolds. Let's have an
example:
sage: S2 =
