On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 11:14:01 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2017-04-07 19:23, Nils Bruin wrote:
> > Importing
> > infrastructure has changed significantly between Py2 and Py3\
>
> Really? What has changed?
>
> I was mainly looking at
https://docs.python.org/2/reference/simple_s
On 2017-04-07 19:23, Nils Bruin wrote:
Importing
infrastructure has changed significantly between Py2 and Py3\
Really? What has changed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 7:23:59 PM UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 6:18:47 PM UTC+2, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>
>> From a user point of view, they are already imported so you shouldn't
>> have to do anything.
>>
>
> A user of Sage also writes scripts where he or she
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 6:18:47 PM UTC+2, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> From a user point of view, they are already imported so you shouldn't have
> to do anything.
>
A user of Sage also writes scripts where he or she often imports lcm or
gcd.
I also prefer the specific module in general, bu
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:18:47 AM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> You're welcome, with a very special thanks to Jeroen for his help.
>
> From a user point of view, they are already imported so you shouldn't have
> to do anything. However, I am split on doing imports from all or the
> spec
You're welcome, with a very special thanks to Jeroen for his help.
>From a user point of view, they are already imported so you shouldn't have
to do anything. However, I am split on doing imports from all or the
specific module, but I defer to the latter because it could potentially not
trigger
Done.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22774
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
On 07/04/2017 10:13, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
From the user point of view, everything should be
imported as
from sage.arith.all import gcd, lcm
I agree. So the warning message should guide a user to import lcm from
sage.arith.al
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> From the user point of view, everything should be
> imported as
>
> from sage.arith.all import gcd, lcm
>
I agree. So the warning message should guide a user to import lcm from
sage.arith.all.
--
You received this message
No you are not. From the user point of view, everything should be
imported as
from sage.arith.all import gcd, lcm
Vincent
On 07/04/2017 10:06, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hello,
You are perfectly right. Can you open a ticket on trac?
Vincent
On 07/04/2017 09:46, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
Hi,
As of
Hello,
You are perfectly right. Can you open a ticket on trac?
Vincent
On 07/04/2017 09:46, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
Hi,
As of Sage 8.0.beta, the location of lcm has changed from "sage.arith.misc"
to "sage.arith.functions", and the deprecation warning warns that I should
import lcm directly from "s
Hi,
As of Sage 8.0.beta, the location of lcm has changed from "sage.arith.misc"
to "sage.arith.functions", and the deprecation warning warns that I should
import lcm directly from "sage.arith.functions".
But the close friend gcd is still in "sage.arith.misc" and an ordinary user
like me would
12 matches
Mail list logo
