Re: [sage-devel] BipartiteGraph status

2010-03-01 Thread Joshua Herman
Sounds like a good summer of code project? LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE--- http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote: I'm having a lovely conversation with myself in the comments for trac #8350 that I

[sage-devel] BipartiteGraph status

2010-02-26 Thread Ryan Hinton
I'm having a lovely conversation with myself in the comments for trac #8350 that I want to share. :-) There are two related problems. 1. The current BipartiteGraph class is incomplete, see trac #1941. I want to use it, so I'm trying to plug some of the holes. In particular, trac #8350

Re: [sage-devel] BipartiteGraph status

2010-02-26 Thread David Joyner
This is an interesting post. A few informal comments below. On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote: I'm having a lovely conversation with myself in the comments for trac #8350 that I want to share. :-) There are two related problems. 1.  The current

Re: [sage-devel] BipartiteGraph status

2010-02-26 Thread Robert Miller
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote: ... OK, assume we solve (1) by requiring an indication of which partition a vertex belongs in and raising an exception otherwise.  What about Graph algorithms that change the graph temporarily or just don't do the right thing