Erik Lane wrote:
Post it where? Here to the list? Should I assume that what holds
true for Ubuntu is more general, or just make notes in the text that
let people know that on Ubuntu that's the way it is? (Because that's
all I have available to me.)
I looked into it, and looks
'binutils' is not a program, but a collection of programs from GNU, which
happens to include ranlib, ar, ld and others.
Yes, but I was suggesting the change because of issues I had trying to
install ranlib. I attempted it and was told that apt-get couldn't find it. I
then did some searching
Issues with the install:
README.txt needs updating. At least for Ubuntu ranlib doesn't show up as an
option for apt-get, but it is part of the binutils package. Also needs to be
updated re: the new requirements for gfortran. It still lists the old info.
GCC needs to be all lowercase for apt-get
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Erik Lane erikl...@gmail.com wrote:
Issues with the install:
README.txt needs updating. At least for Ubuntu ranlib doesn't show up as an
option for apt-get, but it is part of the binutils package. Also needs to be
updated re: the new requirements for gfortran.
Hi Erik,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Erik Lane erikl...@gmail.com wrote:
Issues with the install:
README.txt needs updating. At least for Ubuntu ranlib doesn't show up as an
option for apt-get, but it is part of the binutils package. Also needs to be
updated re: the new requirements for
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Erik Lane erikl...@gmail.com wrote:
Issues with the install:
README.txt needs updating. At least for Ubuntu ranlib doesn't show up as
an
option for apt-get, but it is part of the
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erik,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Erik Lane erikl...@gmail.com wrote:
Issues with the install:
README.txt needs updating. At least for Ubuntu ranlib doesn't show up as
an
option for apt-get, but it is
Post it where? Here to the list? Should I assume that what holds true for
Ubuntu is more general, or just make notes in the text that let people know
that on Ubuntu that's the way it is? (Because that's all I have available to
me.)
I looked into it, and looks like it's very standard that
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:31:26PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
We've hand-inspected the R failures and they are all because of
missing optional R packages that we don't include with Sage.
I also found out later that there's a new R spkg by kcrisman at #6532 (needs
review) that should pass all
