2009/6/21 Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <bjarke.ro...@gmail.com>: > > I quote from > > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/inclusion.html > > which is about the inclusion procedure for new packages. The first > requirement is written as: > > "The license must be a GPL version 2+ compatible license. (This will > be publicly revisited around Jan 15, 2009.)" > > Whatever was decided or not decided around Jan 15, the date or the > statement is in need of being updated.
The GPL v2+ restriction wasn't publicly revisited. Therefore, let's publicly revisit it. Does anybody who cares a lot have a strong opinion on whether Sage should start allowing in new libraries that are licensed GPLv3+? If so, why? Please, no flamebait, unless you post only to the sage-flame mailing list http://groups.google.com/group/sage-flame where flaming is encouraged. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
