There is a long discussion on this
here http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17498 the original ticket which
created the ::PLOT/sphinx_plot possibility.
El lunes, 25 de enero de 2016, 21:24:58 (UTC+1), Jeroen Demeyer escribió:
>
> I'm sure there is probably a good reason, but why don't we just displa
I'm sure there is probably a good reason, but why don't we just display
all plots in the documentation?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, jhonrubia6 wrote:
Does it makes sense to you if I modify the plot.py docstrings in order to
include PLOT:: blocks? Wouldn't it be more clear for newbies?
Of course it would. And same applies to different plot()-functions; at
least graphs and posets have these.
--
Jori M
+1
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
Hello,
> Does it makes sense to you if I modify the plot.py docstrings in order to
> include PLOT:: blocks? Wouldn't it be more clear for newbies? (well it wold
> have helped me anyway)
To me it makes sense. Illustrating with pictures the output of
commands meant to produce pictures cannot exactl
Does it makes sense to you if I modify the plot.py docstrings in order to
include PLOT:: blocks? Wouldn't it be more clear for newbies? (well it wold
have helped me anyway)
Has it been discussed?
Javier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" g
