Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Volker Braun
In spkg-install you need to add a suitable branch in configure_base(): On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 11:36:42 AM UTC+1, Snark wrote: Hi, Le 21/02/2015 17:25, Volker Braun a écrit : The atlas build script just aborts with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, nothing else to see here. I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 21/02/2015 17:25, Volker Braun a écrit : The atlas build script just aborts with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, nothing else to see here. I compiled sage-6.5 with my usual setup, then tried: export SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes ./sage -f atlas and the compilation with : Traceback (most recent call

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 15:05, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 23/02/2015 14:27, Julien Puydt a écrit : That will take some time though : this box isn't fast. And I work on it while it plays with sage. In fact, when an arch is given, it does compile ad nauseum so it doesn't take that much time. The box

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Volker Braun
The base configuration is supposed to be a fixed one. If you want to tune for your respective cpu then we can do that already. On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 3:26:47 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: Le 23/02/2015 15:05, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 23/02/2015 14:27, Julien Puydt a écrit : That will

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 23/02/2015 12:13, Volker Braun a écrit : In spkg-install you need to add a suitable branch in configure_base(): Yes, but my question was : how do I know how to write that branch? I didn't manage to get from configuration import conf to work, so I couldn't look at 'conf' to know what

[sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2015-02-23, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote: Le 23/02/2015 15:05, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 23/02/2015 14:27, Julien Puydt a écrit : That will take some time though : this box isn't fast. And I work on it while it plays with sage. In fact, when an arch is given, it does

[sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 3:34:08 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On 2015-02-23, Julien Puydt julien...@laposte.net javascript: wrote: Le 23/02/2015 15:05, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 23/02/2015 14:27, Julien Puydt a écrit : That will take some time though : this box isn't fast.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 15:34, Volker Braun a écrit : The base configuration is supposed to be a fixed one. If you want to tune for your respective cpu then we can do that already. What do we fix to, then armv7 or armv6 ? Snark on #sagemath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 15:33, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : hmm, shouldn't there also be a distinction between hardware and software floats? (Although I believe ARM chips you want to run Sage on all have hardware floats - but the question is how the OS is configured). There is already code in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 14:27, Julien Puydt a écrit : Hi, Le 23/02/2015 12:13, Volker Braun a écrit : In spkg-install you need to add a suitable branch in configure_base(): Yes, but my question was : how do I know how to write that branch? I didn't manage to get from configuration import conf to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 15:40, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : I agree with Volker, just put one thing here. I would say: arch='ARMv6' for base (and arch=ARMv7 for fast if you want to enable a fast configuration). It would also be good to put ISA= (don't remember the var name or syntax) to explicitely

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 15:48, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 23/02/2015 15:40, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : I agree with Volker, just put one thing here. I would say: arch='ARMv6' for base (and arch=ARMv7 for fast if you want to enable a fast configuration). It would also be good to put ISA= (don't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Volker Braun
Yes, exactly! On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 4:16:40 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: If I put something similar in configure_fast, will I be able to test it looks good using : export SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=fast ./sage -f atlas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 23/02/2015 16:25, Volker Braun a écrit : Yes, exactly! On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 4:16:40 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: If I put something similar in configure_fast, will I be able to test it looks good using : export SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=fast ./sage -f atlas It's ticket #17843. And this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-23 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 5:25:07 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: The atlas build script just aborts with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, nothing else to see here. Pointing to a specific location for the atlas library isn't going to be much use in a binary that we distribute. On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-21 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 21/02/2015 14:56, Volker Braun a écrit : We have an ARM buildbot but it doesn't work: atlas install fails when SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes is set. If you have an idea about suitable defaults then we could make it automatic *hint* Is there a trac ticket or some such on the matter, with some kind of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-21 Thread Volker Braun
The atlas build script just aborts with SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=base, nothing else to see here. Pointing to a specific location for the atlas library isn't going to be much use in a binary that we distribute. On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 4:54:12 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: Le 21/02/2015 14:56,

[sage-devel] Re: [ARM] sage 6.5

2015-02-21 Thread Volker Braun
We have an ARM buildbot but it doesn't work: atlas install fails when SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes is set. If you have an idea about suitable defaults then we could make it automatic *hint* On Saturday, February 21, 2015 at 2:30:10 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: Hi, is there an ARM build box which will