Hi Carl!
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 06:11:52AM -0700, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
> wrote:
> > In fact, I'd love to be able to do:
> >
> >from SymmetricFunctions(QQ).shorthands import *
> >
> > Furthermore, providing the user with (opti
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> In fact, I'd love to be able to do:
>
>from SymmetricFunctions(QQ).shorthands import *
>
> Furthermore, providing the user with (optional but easy to load)
> shorthands promotes their standardization among all users. This makes
Dear Andrew,
I hope my previous message clarified the discussion. Let me know if
there are some unanswered parts to your message.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 07:31:22PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> another possibility for the syntax for algebras with many
> bases:
> sage: H = HeckeAlge
Dear David, dear Andrew,
Sorry, for having introduced confusion here by going straight to the
details without explaining the general structure. What you describe is
essentially what we want to achieve, though with a different layout.
And I am very glad to see that we agree on the fundamen
Dear David and Nicolas,
On Mar 14, 9:42 am, David Kohel wrote:
> I would suggest that the choice of basis (or generators) should
> be an intrinsic part of the algebra's representation and interface.
> Different representations imply different (but possibly equal, even
> canonically equal) algebr
Dear David and Nicolas,
On Mar 14, 9:42 am, David Kohel wrote:
> I would suggest that the choice of basis (or generators) should
> be an intrinsic part of the algebra's representation and interface.
> Different representations imply different (but possibly equal, even
> canonically equal) algebr
Hi Nicolas,
I would suggest that the choice of basis (or generators) should
be an intrinsic part of the algebra's representation and interface.
Different representations imply different (but possibly equal, even
canonically equal) algebras.
Compare free modules and polynomial rings:
sage: V = F
