On Dec 1, 6:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
(In a letter apparently addressed to WRI and posted here...)..
...
> To save any further discussions on the Sage developers list about
> whether the use of WolframAlpha in the way I explained would be
> permissible, could you please clarify the matter.
W
On Dec 2, 7:37 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> Query: why would we use wolfram alpha, when (for example) the
> University of Washington has a site license for mathematica?
Oddly enough, I agree with Tom.
RJF
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from t
On 2 December 2010 16:31, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Disclaimer; I am not a bar room lawyer, etc.
>
> I think this phrase may be key;
> "...incidental results or small groups of results from Wolfram|Alpha
> on non-commercial websites and blogs..."
> It depends on one's working defini
Disclaimer; I am not a bar room lawyer, etc.
I think this phrase may be key;
"...incidental results or small groups of results from Wolfram|Alpha
on non-commercial websites and blogs..."
It depends on one's working definition of "small", maybe they are
deliberately ambiguous here.
"A dozen or so..
