[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-07 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:59 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit > > it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of > > patches?

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread mabshoff
On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit > it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of > patches? > The idea is to add doctests. One would add doctests to one file or directory of fi

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Timothy Clemans
Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of patches? On Mar 6, 9:55 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think the bes

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are > interested in something in there please let me know so I don't > duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the > phc, mathematic

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread mhampton
I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are interested in something in there please let me know so I don't duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the phc, mathematica, and tachyon interfaces. Will this be coordinated on IRC, or a wiki, or somethi

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Chris Swierczewski
On Mar 6, 3:06 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, you're local.  Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in > Capitol Hill? Sure thing! I'd like to get some Sage work done in the morning. (Algebra study session in the mid-afternoon.) Are there any other Seattle-ites out there

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 at 10:01AM -0800, William Stein wrote: > Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. > This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose > that we have a "Sage Doc Days" this Sunday. Whose interested in > helping? Since I opened a tic

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ ^^ Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in Capitol Hill? > Will you be publishing a list of which modules are

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Chris Swierczewski
I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/ rings (ring.pyx, ideal.pyx, integer_ring.pyx). I'd like to see where people want to see more detailed docstrings and doctests. -- Chris Swierczewski --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, sen

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Craig Citro
I'm in. I'll likely work on either modular/hecke (24.7%) or modular/modsym (14.2%). -cc On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:01 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. > This is one of the more > difficult goals for Sa

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread David Joyner
Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable doctest coverage? On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. > This is one of the more > difficult goals for Sage

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread mhampton
I will try to help, although my weekends get consumed by family obligations sometimes. I'm not sure what areas are low in coverage that I am competent to help with. Almost all of my use of sage involves optional packages - phcpack, biopython, and polymake. The easiest thing for me would be to a

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread Timothy Clemans
I would love to help! On Mar 6, 10:17 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by > the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.) > > However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent > and

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread John Cremona
Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.) However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent and will continue to do so when possible! John On 06/03/2008, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

[sage-devel] Re: Doc Days

2008-03-06 Thread David Harvey
On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote: > Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%. > This is one of the more > difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a "Sage Doc > Days" this Sunday. > Whose interested in helping? Sure. david --~--~