[sage-devel] Re: Docstring-wide "# optional" markup (#20427) / I am grumpy

2016-04-14 Thread Simon King
Hi Jeroen, On 2016-04-14, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-04-14 00:00, Simon King wrote: >> If I understand correctly, such a decorator would not work in Cython code. > > Why not? Cython supports decorators. I occasionally got errors telling me that Cython does not support arbitrary decorators.

[sage-devel] Re: Docstring-wide "# optional" markup (#20427) / I am grumpy

2016-04-14 Thread Simon King
Hi Martin, On 2016-04-13, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > A thought: it might in fact be a feature that tab completion *does* show > methods which only work with optional packages. I usually try > tab-completion first. I won't mind at all hitting an error message "Please > install the opt

[sage-devel] Re: Docstring-wide "# optional" markup (#20427) / I am grumpy

2016-04-13 Thread Simon King
On 2016-04-12, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On the other hand I am frustrated with the tone of sage-devel these > days. I would really appreciate if e-mails would acknowledge others > efforts; something like "thanks for the suggestion and for > investigating how to implement it". +1 > I am not goi