On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4) Ran the following command "epydoc --html -o sage-epydoc sage"
Sorry about the double post, but you'll want to add a
--docformat=plaintext option in there as well.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The weirdness seems to appear when the default for a parameter is None.
Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why it's doing that.
>
> What extra magic would cause the latex parts of the docstrings to be
> jsmath'ed ?
>
There a
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
> to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
> sage.all at the top of the epydoc script). You can find the
> docum
The weirdness seems to appear when the default for a parameter is None.
What extra magic would cause the latex parts of the docstrings to be jsmath'ed ?
John
2008/7/17 David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I played aroun
On Jul 17, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
> to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
> sage.all at the top of the epydoc script). You can find the
> documentation at
> http://sa
Wow. This is amazing and great that you did this!
Thanks very much Mike.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
> to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importi
I took a quick look at that link and it looks brilliant to me. Just
this afternoon Francis Clarke and I were saying how nice it would be
to have something just like this, and I observed that there was
probably someone in the Sage community clever enough to do it. Were
you reading my mind?
John
