Hi folks,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:49 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
as expected changes over 3.4.1.rc4 are minimal:
Merged in Sage 3.4.1.final:
#5284: Michael Abshoff: Set sage-flags.txt up to SSE2 only when
building Sage in SSE2 only mode/remove SSSE3 and
On Apr 27, 4:48 am, evan foss evanf...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok thanks, I have been wondering about the performance of netbooks.
well, i'm surprised how good it is. you can give me some calculations
and i can benchmark it.
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
I just want to add that 3.4.1 compiles on my hp 2140 netbook (3.4
didn't) on a dual core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 / model 28
All tests pass, except for a timeout in schemes/elliptic_curves/
ell_rational_field.py
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
How long did that take to build?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to add that 3.4.1 compiles on my hp 2140 netbook (3.4
didn't) on a dual core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 / model 28
All tests pass, except for a timeout in
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:25 AM, evan foss evanf...@gmail.com wrote:
How long did that take to build?
I did a similar build and it took about 10 hours I think. Most of the
time (maybe 2-4 hours?) is spent running the FLINT *test suite*, not
building anything (so, I think running the FLINT
On Apr 26, 5:25 pm, evan foss evanf...@gmail.com wrote:
How long did that take to build?
don't know, some hours. .. started in the night before going to sleep
and in the morning everything was done. i did a parallel make and i
have 2 gb of ram. maybe 10 hours, but i think it was faster.
h
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 5:25 pm, evan foss evanf...@gmail.com wrote:
How long did that take to build?
don't know, some hours. .. started in the night before going to sleep
and in the morning everything was done. i did a
2009/4/22 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
Thanks for the build report.
The following tests failed:
sage -t
2009/4/23 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com:
2009/4/22 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
Thanks for the build report.
The latest RC of MPIR 1.1.1 should fix this issue.
Bill.
On 23 Apr, 01:43, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Marshall. I think I have a fix for this. But I've started a thread
on the MPIR development list for this:
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/
ell_rational_field.py
sage -t
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On an upgrade from 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (intel) I get the following
doctest errors:
Thanks for the build report.
The following tests failed:
sage -t
On Apr 22, 1:50 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:54 pm, David M. Monarres dmmonar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
SNIP
The other two failures are upgrade specific and happen when when left
over pyc and so files are around due to the Quaternion classes being
moved.
I am having an error in building 3.4.1 on an intel mac running 10.5.
The error is in mpir:
Deleting assembly files which depend on PIC assembly working or 32 bit
OSX on Intel hardware
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `penryn-apple-
darwin9.6.0': machine `penryn-apple' not
Hi Marshall. I think I have a fix for this. But I've started a thread
on the MPIR development list for this:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mpir-devel/browse_thread/thread/34a4e60f556c8ba3
Bill.
On 22 Apr, 23:31, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having an error in building
15 matches
Mail list logo
