On 02/27/11 04:25 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
http://jameswharris.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/mathematica-versus-sage/
Interestingly, his only significant complaint about Sage is that it
isn't easy to use as a Windows user. Which is a totally valid
complaint given the state of using Sage on Windo
> Interestingly, his only significant complaint about Sage is that it
> isn't easy to use as a Windows user. Which is a totally valid
> complaint given the state of using Sage on Windows right now, but that
> was the main obstruction.
>
> - Robert
Concerning an easy windows version:
I recently di
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:26 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> In contrast, when searching for "Mathematica", the first hit with Sage in the
>> name is around #50, which is a comparison of "Mathematica vs Sage" - one
>> where
>> the author clearly considers Mathematica much better.
>>
>> http://jameswharr
> In contrast, when searching for "Mathematica", the first hit with Sage in the
> name is around #50, which is a comparison of "Mathematica vs Sage" - one where
> the author clearly considers Mathematica much better.
>
> http://jameswharris.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/mathematica-versus-sage/
Though
On 02/26/11 09:33 PM, kcrisman wrote:
I'm fine with spending a bit of money on advertising, but it does seem
odd to me to particularly single out a competitor. Terms like "math
software" could be useful.
"maths software" seems less useful to me. Sage is already #5 on Google if you
search f
> I'm fine with spending a bit of money on advertising, but it does seem
> odd to me to particularly single out a competitor. Terms like "math
> software" could be useful.
Yes. Though I suppose in theory Dave can spend his pounds any way he
wishes :)
--
To post to this group, send an email to
