I always advice to build from source. Takes a bit of time though...
On Jan 23, 12:49 am, Niles wrote:
> On Jan 22, 11:37 am, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > The 10.6 version will probably not run on Leopard, though one could
> > try. Usually the Sage on Mac has been forward-compatible only, based
> > on
On Jan 22, 11:37 am, kcrisman wrote:
> The 10.6 version will probably not run on Leopard, though one could
> try. Usually the Sage on Mac has been forward-compatible only, based
> on the support list emails. So the 10.4 binary should be just fine.
>
> What this means is that we could use some
A partial answer to my own question: The installation instructions at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadAndInstallationGuide
and
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/binary.html
look pretty easy to update. Now I just need to know what to recommend
for 10.5, 64-bit Mac users.
-Niles
--
T
> I know I have a 64bit OS and processor, so the first two seem better.
> But I'm running OS X 10.5, not 10.6, so the 10.6 in the filenames
> scares me. Also I could not find any information about the difference
> between the -Darwin and the -Darwin-app versions.
>
> Should I go for the older sage
