On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(), paste
th
On 5/13/11 6:00 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
On 5/13/11, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated.
On 5/14/11 7:57 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
Should
we contact David Cervone on this?
I emailed Davide and sent him the link to this thread the other day.
There may be more developments from when he may have looked at it, though.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-
Look at
http://moralfiber.org/eylon/berkeley/cs282/
to see a paper,
Parsing Mathematics Typeset in TeX
that successfully parsed many many formulas
from Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, a table of integrals.
The result was Lisp, which presumably could be Maxima.
If you have a result in Maxima, presumably Sa
On 5/14/11 10:25 AM, rjf wrote:
Look at
http://moralfiber.org/eylon/berkeley/cs282/
to see a paper,
Parsing Mathematics Typeset in TeX
that successfully parsed many many formulas
from Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, a table of integrals.
The result was Lisp, which presumably could be Maxima.
If you have
It is possible to define a a program that will take a single language
and produce from it either TeX, Lisp, Sage, Mathematica, Maple,
Maxima, MathML, etc.
That does not solve the problem of taking some random TeX formula, not
using that language of macros etc, and converting it into a CAS
formula.
To follow up on my other posts in this thread, the code written by
Eylon Caspi for a class project, to translate from TeX to (lisp) is
now in
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/parsetex-public.tar
There are files in this project which we used which we cannot publish
because the copyright i
RJF's point is the one that has been on my mind as I try to come up to
speed on this discussion. TeX formulae are written to generate some
graphical effect; their algebraic structure is some combination of
accident and good style, not anything that the language forces on the
author. You can't exp
On May 16, 8:10 am, Stephen Nuchia wrote:
...
>
> I have a dream of being able to write math in LaTeX and have "the
> system" "just know" what I'm talking about,
Can you pick up any journal in any scientific discipline and read the
mathematical formulas and just know what the author is talking
On 5/13/11, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> If I have a Sage expression, I can do
>>
>> latex(foo)
>>
>> to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
>>
>> Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
>> find it easier to loo
On Fri, 13 May 2011 at 07:00AM -0400, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
> Anyway, give me some examples, and one or two weeks, and I'll try to
> produce a prototype.
That's the kind of answer I was hoping for! "Give me your problem, and
I'll find a solution for you." Excellent! :)
Here's what I was working w
@Mike: I couldn't find precise info about the cadabra TeX input, but I
found odd things: "x^{2x+1}" is interpreted as "x^{2+x+1}". I may be
misunderstanding something, though.
@Dan: I just had to add the rule ")(" => ")*(" that I had forgotten
yesterday, and here is what I get:
(((x-1)*(x**(4)*(1
> http://moralfiber.org/eylon/berkeley/cs282/
Thank you, this was an interesting read, which motivates me to revise
my current approach slightly. I think that I need to keep more
information in a first pass, in order to correctly handle subscripts
and superscripts. I still don't know how to place
Since TeX is turing complete and allows macros,
would it be possible to create a set of macros
that are not ambiguous? For instance, an integral
macro that specifies the limits and differential
variable?
\integrate{0}{\infty}{r}{sin(\theta)}
In this case it seems to me that the latex macros
would
14 matches
Mail list logo
