[sage-devel] Re: LaTeX names of symbolic functions lost after simplification

2016-03-14 Thread Nils Bruin
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 3:32:10 PM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Thanks for these detailed explanations. > I understand that the fix requires some significant work on symbolic > functions. > This would be quite nice however, since most symbolic computations require > simplification at

[sage-devel] Re: LaTeX names of symbolic functions lost after simplification

2016-03-13 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 7:19:44 PM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:08:51 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >> >> >> Is this a known issue? Shall I open a ticket for it? >> >> I think it's known, but difficult to solve. > Yes, please see http://trac.sagemath.org/tic

[sage-devel] Re: LaTeX names of symbolic functions lost after simplification

2016-03-13 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Thanks for these detailed explanations. I understand that the fix requires some significant work on symbolic functions. This would be quite nice however, since most symbolic computations require simplification at the end. In the current setting, the LaTeX symbol is thus always lost. -- You

[sage-devel] Re: LaTeX names of symbolic functions lost after simplification

2016-03-13 Thread Nils Bruin
On Sunday, March 13, 2016 at 8:08:51 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > > Is this a known issue? Shall I open a ticket for it? > > I think it's known, but difficult to solve. Consider this: sage: f1=function('f') sage: f2=function('f') sage: f3=function('f',latex_name='F') sage: f1(x).operator(