Maybe I am too late with this, but I have just a couple of comments. I
like the clean slide layout with no unnecessary information like "name
of the speaker" and "day of the talk" etc., it provides for a very
high signal to noise ratio. The slides feel balanced.
On the other hand, there is too mu
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:27:45 -, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I didn't know I was going to get quoted! (That's fine, of
> course.)
>
> Are we suppose to write "SAGE" since it's an acronym or "Sage" like
> you do?
Write "Sage". There used to be an acronym, but the acronym no l
A typo: on page 11, replace "permutations groups" with "permutation groups".
On page 38, you say #sage-devel. You might also want to give the irc
server's address.
Looks like a great intro to Sage. Good luck with the talk.
-Bobby
On Nov 9, 2007 4:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, I didn't know I was going to get quoted! (That's fine, of
course.)
Are we suppose to write "SAGE" since it's an acronym or "Sage" like
you do?
JV
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
