[sage-devel] Re: Numbers multiplication by juxtaposition

2012-08-09 Thread leif
On 9 Aug., 19:58, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > Ok, I've opened > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13356 > > but it seems to me that the issue is inside ginac and I don't know how > to fix it. If so, report upstream... ;-) -leif -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Numbers multiplication by juxtaposition

2012-08-09 Thread Andrea Lazzarotto
2012/8/9 Andrey Novoseltsev > Check spacing of coefficients of mul expressions (#3202): > sage: latex(2*3^x) > 2 \, 3^{x} > > Does anyone think that this is indeed the proper way to output such > expressions?.. > Absolutely not. It's just wrong. :) 2012/8/9 Andrey Novoseltsev > Ok, I've opene

[sage-devel] Re: Numbers multiplication by juxtaposition

2012-08-09 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Ok, I've opened http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13356 but it seems to me that the issue is inside ginac and I don't know how to fix it. Andrey -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsub

[sage-devel] Re: Numbers multiplication by juxtaposition

2012-08-09 Thread leif
On 9 Aug., 18:57, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > Hello, > > I don't like the following output: > > sage: e = 2 * 2^(1/3) > sage: print latex(e) > 2 \, 2^{\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)} > > which looks way too much like 22^(1/3). I think that there should be > explicit \cdot instead of \, > However, the do