On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
From the top README.txt
---
NOT SUPPORTED:
* FreeBSD
* Arch Linux
* Gentoo
On 2009-Jun-24 00:56:38 +0100, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Would it not be sensible to ask around on some FreeBSD/NetBSD mailing
lists etc, and see if one could drum up enough support to start a port?
I've done some work on getting Sage to work on FreeBSD but there is
still
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:17 AM, peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Jun-24 00:56:38 +0100, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Would it not be sensible to ask around on some FreeBSD/NetBSD mailing
lists etc, and see if one could drum up enough support to start a port?
On 2009-Jun-25 09:09:02 +0200, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
The main problems with building Sage on BSD, in my experience, are
that (1) you have to gmake instead of make to run the GNU version
of Make, which is a pain,
My approach to this was to symlink gmake to $SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/make
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Peter
Jeremypeterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Jun-25 09:09:02 +0200, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
The main problems with building Sage on BSD, in my experience, are
that (1) you have to gmake instead of make to run the GNU version
of Make,
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
From the top README.txt
---
NOT SUPPORTED:
* FreeBSD
* Arch Linux
* Gentoo Linux
* Microsoft Windows (via Visual Studio C++)
* Microsoft Windows (via
