2009/9/16 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
I think networkx 0.99 will require some nontrivial work in Sage, since
they changed a lot of things.
I forgot to say about another package, but at least
Jason Grout wrote:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Do you have any idea as to what would be the proper way to correct
this issue? Preferably without needing to use an older maxima for the
sage package :-)
This change was actually motived by a request from the Sage project :).
Also see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6165.
On Sep 15, 9:28 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in
the matrix code. If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be
greatly appreciated!
But all
For some reason SR eigenvectors were never actually tested, I think -
because they inherit directly from matrix2.pyx! In fact, the error
comes from eigenspaces_left in that file, where G = self.fcp() calls
degree of a symbolic expression, which now requires an argument ! The
symbolic
kcrisman wrote:
For some reason SR eigenvectors were never actually tested, I think -
because they inherit directly from matrix2.pyx! In fact, the error
comes from eigenspaces_left in that file, where G = self.fcp() calls
degree of a symbolic expression, which now requires an argument !
2009/9/15 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in
the matrix code. If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be
greatly appreciated!
But all doctests pass for me in alpha1:
./sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/
All
2009/9/15 Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py
**
File /usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py, line 155:
sage: g = graphs.PetersenGraph()
Expected
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2009/9/15 Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py
**
File /usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py, line 155:
sage: g =
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
I think networkx 0.99 will require some nontrivial work in Sage, since
they changed a lot of things.
NetworkX 1.0 should be out soon under the BSD license. Previous
versions were under LGPL.
--
Regards
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Hi,
In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the
maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's
maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the
cell:
A.eigenvectors()
maxima 5.16.3
2009/9/14 Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Hi,
In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the
maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's
maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when
kcrisman wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:51 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Hi,
In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the
maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's
12 matches
Mail list logo
