PS: if you have SageMath 8.7 installed and want to use the fix introduced
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27576, it is quite easy: simply open a
console at the SageMath root directory and type:
git remote add trac git://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git
git checkout -b wedge_fixed
git pull trac
Hi,
Thanks MJ for reporting the bug and opening the ticket.
It is fixed in the ticket branch now.
Nils: yes I banged my head on the desk a couple of times :-)
Best wishes,
Eric.
Le samedi 30 mars 2019 20:49:37 UTC+1, MJ a écrit :
>
> Yes, of course. I'm just too impatient for tasks like
Yes, of course. I'm just too impatient for tasks like this. Here's the
ticket:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27576#ticket
Am Samstag, 30. März 2019 20:35:19 UTC+1 schrieb Nils Bruin:
>
> Type: defect
> (you can leave it major, unless you really feel it's minor)
> Component: Manifolds, but
Type: defect
(you can leave it major, unless you really feel it's minor)
Component: Manifolds, but that doesn't exist, so Geometry I guess
cc likely authors to speed things up (Copyright in the file suggests
Gourgoulhon and/or Scrimshaw )
post a link to the ticket here when you've filed. That
Oh yes, the chart is wrongly defined. It should be:
|sage: c_xy.=U.chart()|
||obviously. I copied it once, changed the variables, and copied it back
changing the variables again. Sorry.|
|
What are appropriate settings for a ticket regarding this issue? I'm a
ticket virgin.|
|
Am
On Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 7:39:51 AM UTC-7, YoungMath wrote:
>
> Or, maybe, a better approach would be a direct manipulation via resu._name
> and resu._latex_name.
>
> However, I'm not familiar with the procedure. Furthermore, is this mailing
> list right the place to discuss my written
Or, maybe, a better approach would be a direct manipulation via resu._name
and resu._latex_name.
However, I'm not familiar with the procedure. Furthermore, is this mailing
list right the place to discuss my written code?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
