Burcin Erocal wrote:
Hi Dag,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:55:17 -0800 (PST)
dagss da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
What I hope can happen:
- The NumPy/SciPy world gets an object oriented matrix library (mine
or something else). They won't be adopting Sage soon anyway.
- Then, as a step 2,
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable without Sage (but
loosely
On Mar 2, 3:39 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable without Sage (but
loosely modeled after it). That
On 03/01/2010 09:37 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable
