[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Simon King
Hi Minh On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: ... My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory. After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up Sage as root at

[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Jaap Spies
Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi David, On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10 03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a

[sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Jaap Spies
Simon King wrote: Hi Minh On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote: My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory. After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Readme not very accurate about installing a binary distribution

2009-11-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Simon, On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote: SNIP I guess David's point was that this information should be stated more clearly in the Readme text. See ticket #7565 [1] for a newer README.txt file. I hope the newer README.txt is much clearer about the