On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:07:18PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Here's my ideal system (which rietveld may or may not be a part of,
but certainly it'd be better to not start something from scratch).
(0) I hack on my own code, committing as I want, the normal mercurial
way.
(1) I run a
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
A google search for rietveld mercurial shows lots of work on
That is *very* cool. We should put that in a wiki page so we can plan a way
to transition to a system like that.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Sorry, I mean't
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
A google search for rietveld mercurial shows lots of work on this
problem.
Very cool.
As mentioned, I used this system all summer, and it is very
I'll try and join. I'll be up until around noon CST.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
We have been extremely blessed
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:54:20PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Please, please, please, finish up to review the remaining
categories on
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/CategoriesCategoriesReview!
I'll try to join, but Greenwich time won't be very compatible ...
Depends on how
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96 tickets...
I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
improve the review situation?
It might help if someone is responsible, therefore I propose to create
review coordinators, who are
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96 tickets...
I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
improve the review situation?
It might help if someone
Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
* 96
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote:
Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
Yes, I hope we will! Any volunteers to set it up?
Robert Bradshaw would be a good candidate since he used it all summer,
etc., however as his thesis adviser I really
On Sep 22, 3:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw, who worked all summer at Google, said that they have
an incredibly good code review webapp there,...
rietveld? Well, it's better than trac i guess, but software alone
isn't everything.
Here an example for a sympy review
On Sep 22, 4:47 pm, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here an example for a sympy review in rietveld..
Ah, that's nice, click on expand comments to see annotations inside
diffs:
http://codereview.appspot.com/20078/diff/1/3
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
It seems that he was referring to a href=
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/;Rietveld/a. If so, it doesn't seem we
can use it without a bit of modification, since it's for Subversion.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol t...@timdumol.com wrote:
It seems that he was referring to a href=
http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/;Rietveld/a. If so, it doesn't seem
we can use it without a bit of
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
A google search for rietveld mercurial shows lots of work on this problem.
Jason
--
Jason Grout
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
We have been extremely blessed lately with a load of great
contributions. Currently, there are:
* 96 tickets that have patches/spkgs and are waiting for review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/10. These tickets
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
We have been extremely blessed lately with a load of great
contributions. Currently, there are:
* 96 tickets that have patches/spkgs and are waiting for review:
Cool. Tuesdays aren't very good for me, but I will do my best to do
some reviews that day. I will try to at least address some of the
polytope-related patches.
-Marshall Hampton
On Sep 15, 3:46 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
We have been extremely blessed lately with a
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool. Tuesdays aren't very good for me, but I will do my best to do
It'll only be on Tuesday this time. There are now 4 people up at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/review1
I wish there were more than 4, but that is a
Hi folks,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
William has asked me to announce a Review Day next Tuesday, 22
September. The goal is take care of every ticket that has needs
review status and either declare it positive review or give specific
20 matches
Mail list logo
