[sage-devel] Re: Reviews needed in Graph Theory !

2009-10-31 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody !! > > I am writing about two tickets in Graph Theory that really need reviews... > They have been standing there for some time (something like 3 months !!!), > and I wouldn't mind so much if it was not for the fact that thes

[sage-devel] Re: Reviews needed in Graph Theory !

2009-11-01 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello !!! The two coloring functions are meant to output a number when the user is just interested in the number of classes, but the most "natural" behaviour for these functions is to output a partition of the vertices ( of the edges ) such that each class is an independent set. As the former col

[sage-devel] Re: Reviews needed in Graph Theory

2010-05-08 Thread Nathann Cohen
> If you could > reply with a series of links to the trac tickets, in the priority you > think is appropriate, it would be helpful. Sadly, the "most important" are the older ones, and the hardest to review... But for all the LP tickets one can find lengthy explanations there in the dedicated chapt

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Reviews needed in Graph Theory

2010-05-08 Thread Nathann Cohen
Let me also add to the list of "very easy reviews" the following ones from LP : Improve the arguments for the default type of a variable in MixedIntegerLinearProgram http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7789 CPLEX can now be silenced http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8880 plus they

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Reviews needed in Graph Theory

2010-05-12 Thread David Joyner
I worked on a few of these. Hope that helps a bit. This weekend I should have more time. Feel free to remind me. On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote: >> If you could >> reply with a series of links to the trac tickets, in the priority you >> think is appropriate, it would be hel