On Jan 23, 12:09 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> >> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> > It'
On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
>> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
> tarball in the to
On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
tarball in the top level if you just extract it. I wonder how it
gets put in th
Yeah, I still don't understand why that test failed/aborted, even so.
But I've made the changes to the code. It's not a serious issue, since
it is only the test code, so there's no need for SAGE to update FLINT
in a hurry. I'll issue a patch some time over the next few days or so.
Thanks for doin
On Dec 24, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> I did find some occurrences of 63 instead of FLINT_BITS-1, but I don't
> believe this should be causing any problems with that function.
>
> Since the function doesn't say fail, I can only imagine this is an out
> of memory problem. But I don't s
I did find some occurrences of 63 instead of FLINT_BITS-1, but I don't
believe this should be causing any problems with that function.
Since the function doesn't say fail, I can only imagine this is an out
of memory problem. But I don't see any leaks, nor any requests for
large blocks.
Can you t
On Dec 24, 9:03 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 12:53 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
> > Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
> > it's quite
On Dec 24, 2007 12:53 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
> Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
> it's quite time-consuming?
>
Ok, I'm repositing 2.9.1 with the flint test off.
-- Wil
When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
it's quite time-consuming?
Also I noticed this during the test suite (mac os 10.4.10, ppc g5):
[...]
Testing fmpz_convert()... ok
Testing fmpz_size()... ok
Robert Miller wrote:
> There is an rc3, but there are still issues with the new matplotlib
> spkg on Darwin. We may just roll back to what we were using before...
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-2.9.1.rc3/dist/sage-2.9.1.rc3.tar
>
On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
---
On Dec 23, 2007 11:13 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I don't know if matplotlib has anything to do with this
> issue, as:
>
> File "matrix2.pyx", line 2280, in
> sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix.echelon_form
> RuntimeError
>
> ImportError: No module named _locale
Just t
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2000-June/041688.html
On Dec 23, 1:13 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I don't know if matplotlib has anything to do with this
> issue, as:
>
> File "matrix2.pyx", line 2280, in
> sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix.echelon_form
> Ru
Actually, I don't know if matplotlib has anything to do with this
issue, as:
File "matrix2.pyx", line 2280, in
sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix.echelon_form
RuntimeError
ImportError: No module named _locale
On Dec 23, 12:35 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 12:30 pm, "Wil
On Dec 23, 12:30 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We *have* to get the new matplotlib package to fully work. The one we
> currently ship is very very out of date. I will hopefully be able to
> work on this tonight if nobody else resolves the problems; what are
> they?
It seems
We *have* to get the new matplotlib package to fully work. The one we
currently ship is very very out of date. I will hopefully be able to
work on this tonight if nobody else resolves the problems; what are
they?
On 12/23/07, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is an rc3, but th
There is an rc3, but there are still issues with the new matplotlib
spkg on Darwin. We may just roll back to what we were using before...
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-2.9.1.rc3/dist/sage-2.9.1.rc3.tar
On Dec 23, 11:08 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Se
See attached patch to fix problem below...
On Dec 23, 2007 8:52 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I've fixed the mwrank issues, so const.tex is the only thing left.
> The error:
> sage: show(line([zeta(1/2 + k*I/6) for k in range(180)]),
> rgbcolor=(3/4,1/2,5/8))
> -
OK, I've fixed the mwrank issues, so const.tex is the only thing left.
The error:
sage: show(line([zeta(1/2 + k*I/6) for k in range(180)]),
rgbcolor=(3/4,1/2,5/8))
---
Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/rlmi
Testall on sage.math:
Following tests failed:
sage -t const.tex
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/mwrank.pyx
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/libs/mwrank/interface.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/
ell_rational_field.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic
On Dec 23, 2007 12:09 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The URL:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc2.tar
See
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/build/test/2.9.1.rc2/
for the many test failures on 9 different machines. By the way, perhaps this
sh
On Dec 23, 2007 12:09 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The URL:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc2.tar
>
> summary:
> rc2: four spaces -> tab in spkg/standard/deps, and
> #1558 - Joel Mohler
> - more NTL wrapping, coefficient access and factoring
> #1564
On Dec 22, 2007 11:31 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 4:10 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Build testers: please instead try
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc1.tar
>
Robert,
It appears that there are 2 versions o
On Dec 22, 2007 4:10 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Build testers: please instead try
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc1.tar
This doesn't work at all.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.9.1.rc1]$ make
cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1 | tee -a ../install.log
make[
Build testers: please instead try
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc1.tar
On Dec 22, 4:46 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a build failure due to m4ri importing from the wrong place,
> but this is fixed, rc1 will be up shortly.
>
> On Dec 22, 2:07 p
There is a build failure due to m4ri importing from the wrong place,
but this is fixed, rc1 will be up shortly.
On Dec 22, 2:07 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.rc0.tar
>
> summary:
> rc0:
> #405 -
Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hmm, this is just quote inversion. Sometimes I hate python :)
>
> Nick
>
> On 22-Dec-07, at 9:46 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>> Robert Miller wrote:
>>> is here:
>>>
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha3.tar
>>>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On Fedora 7, 3
On Dec 22, 6:49 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, this is just quote inversion. Sometimes I hate python :)
Robert fixed the issue by changing the expected to the new output of
the doctests. You should speak up if you consider that behavior
incorrect. I assume it had somethin
Hmm, this is just quote inversion. Sometimes I hate python :)
Nick
On 22-Dec-07, at 9:46 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Robert Miller wrote:
>> is here:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha3.tar
>>
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/s
Robert Miller wrote:
> is here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha3.tar
>
Hi Robert,
On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/preparser.py
**
File "preparser.py", lin
On Dec 21, 2007 11:27 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > What needs to happen to go from 2.9.1.alpha2 to a release
> > > candidate and a release?
>
> Also, we *really* need to update COPYING.txt to reflect the new
> packages.
Yes, for ATLAS and R.
Anyway, I built alpha2 on a bu
> > What needs to happen to go from 2.9.1.alpha2 to a release
> > candidate and a release?
Also, we *really* need to update COPYING.txt to reflect the new
packages.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscrib
Re #1130: (point counting on elliptic curves)
The current patch contains incorrect code, as discussed earlier.
However the unpatched function now in Sage is mainly fine for prime
fields since it uses either pari or the fancy sea code depending on
the field size. Secondly, for curves defined over
> What needs to happen to go from 2.9.1.alpha2 to a release
> candidate and a release?
>
> -- William
1. I would like to get patches in for all the critical tickets. In
particular, I'd like to see #1366 fixed up.
2. The following tickets could use review:
#1130, #1155, #1371, #1413, #1418, #144
On Dec 21, 11:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2007 7:30 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sage 2.9.1 alpha2 is out, available at:
>
> >>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha2.tar
>
> On Fedora 7 32 bits:
H
William Stein wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 7:30 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sage 2.9.1 alpha2 is out, available at:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha2.tar
>
On Fedora 7 32 bits:
On Dec 21, 3:30 am, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sage 2.9.1 alpha2 is out, available at:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha2.tar
>
> Closed tickets:
> alpha2:
> #1064 - Robert Miller - permutation __call__ type check
> #1175 - Michael Abshoff - circula
On Dec 20, 2007 7:30 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sage 2.9.1 alpha2 is out, available at:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-2.9.1.alpha2.tar
Robert,
What's the plan? What needs to happen to go from 2.9.1.alpha2 to a release
candidate and a release?
-- Wi
37 matches
Mail list logo
