Done.
On 22/02/2008, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 11:20 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Built ok (kubuntu 7.70, gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease)
> > (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2))
>
>
> Hi John,
>
>
> > The following tests failed:
> >
> >
On Feb 22, 11:20 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Built ok (kubuntu 7.70, gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease)
> (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2))
Hi John,
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
> sage -t de
Built ok (kubuntu 7.70, gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease)
(Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2))
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_ideal.py
Total time for all tests
On Feb 22, 8:52 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
Hi David,
> > I poked around in the install log and the issue is "Resource
> > temporarily unavailable", i.e. the dreaded OSX resource limits that
> > are too low. A sugge
On Feb 22, 2008, at 2:43 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I poked around in the install log and the issue is "Resource
> temporarily unavailable", i.e. the dreaded OSX resource limits that
> are too low. A suggested fix is at
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/Tips
Thanks, well spotted!
> So: no
On Feb 22, 4:21 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Michael.Abshoff wrote:
>
> > Could you please post slightly more of the log? It looks like it
> > happens
> > during "make install" which would make it easy to fix. Is it
> > reproducible?
>
> http://sage.
On Feb 22, 10:45 am, "Craig Citro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
> > final.
>
> I got four doctest failures on my OSX Intel 10.5 box:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> sage -t devel/sage-ma
On Feb 22, 8:29 am, "Michael.Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Could you please post slightly more of the log? It looks like it happens
> during "make install" which would make it easy to fix. Is it reproducible?
I built again with -j1, now the build was fine. I'm going to run
doctests on
On Feb 22, 6:37 pm, bill purvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008, Craig Citro wrote:> > this is 2.10.2.rc0, which
> hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
> > > final.
>
> > I got four doctest failures on my OSX Intel 10.5 box:
>
> > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage
On Friday 22 February 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> > this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
> > final.
>
> I got four doctest failures on my OSX Intel 10.5 box:
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/num
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nothing extraordinary: built and tested on dual core
laptop running Gentoo. Everything is ok except for the
two number_field test failures already reported by others.
Best,
Alex
mabshoff wrote:
| Hello folks,
|
| this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefull
> Here are the pow_computer failures:
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/padics/pow_computer.pyx
> **
> File "pow_computer.pyx", line 160:
>sage: PC._pow_mpz_t_tmp_demo(6, 8)
> Expected:
>244140625
> Got:
>1525878906
Problems with sage-2.10.2.rc0:
1. One 32-bit REDHAT, 32-bit Debian (minimal),
The build completely fails at the "sage -br" part with:
...
sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.pyx -->
/home/was/build/sage-2.10.2.rc0/local//lib/python/site-packages//sage/misc/sage_timeit_class.pyx
running install
running bu
On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Michael.Abshoff wrote:
> Could you please post slightly more of the log? It looks like it
> happens
> during "make install" which would make it easy to fix. Is it
> reproducible?
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/dmharvey/install.log.gz
I am going to try buil
David Harvey wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 10:15 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
>> final.
>> Please build and doctest this release and report any issue you
>> come across. At this point only critical issues will be patche
On Feb 21, 2008, at 10:15 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
> final.
> Please build and doctest this release and report any issue you
> come across. At this point only critical issues will be patched,
> i.e. doctest failures o
> this is 2.10.2.rc0, which hopefully will be identical to 2.10.2
> final.
I got four doctest failures on my OSX Intel 10.5 box:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
sage -t devel/sage-main
17 matches
Mail list logo
