[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 failure of clisp on Solaris.

2009-05-05 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: mabshoff wrote: I have a precompiled clisp binary I use. Another option is to use ecl. Since it is 2:20 am I am about to go to sleep, but in the morning I should post a prebuild clisp.spkg. cheers. I'll give that a try. Did you post it? I was not sure where

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 failure of clisp on Solaris.

2009-05-01 Thread mabshoff
On May 1, 1:53 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Somewhat confused by the way Sage appeared to have failed at two different points before, I decided to delete all the sage directory and start again. This time, the Solaris tool chain had the right paths in before I started.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 failure of clisp on Solaris.

2009-05-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
mabshoff wrote: Any clisp release I ever tried to build on Sparc is basically broken with anything later than gcc 3.2.3. There was a thread on clisp-devel about this and it boils down to tthe following: * the clisp people know which file miscompiles * the file is *huge*, ergo the gcc

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2.alpha0 failure of clisp on Solaris.

2009-05-01 Thread mabshoff
On May 1, 2:36 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: mabshoff wrote: Any clisp release I ever tried to build on Sparc is basically broken with anything later than gcc 3.2.3. There was a thread on clisp-devel about this and it boils down to tthe following:  * the clisp