Well, it was [2].
The patch is now ready for a review :-)
Thanks !
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-dev
> I take it the order of facets charged in this call:
Ahahahaahahah !! Stupid me. Yes, of course. I'll give it a try :-)
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To
I take it the order of facets charged in this call:
sage: sigma = rho.facets()[1]
The previous facet must be 0, 2, or 3. If you pick the right index then the
remaining doctests should be unchanged.
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:53:30 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> I am trying to write a