[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for GSoC project: Polynomials - Rewriting and relinking

2017-01-21 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
Jean-Pierre Flori writes: >> >> I would be very interested in working on this. Cool :-) Let's discuss the project description off the mailing list. Also, thanks Peter for your input. We should definitely take a closer look at #15601. Best, Johan -- You received this message because you are

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for GSoC project: Polynomials - Rewriting and relinking

2017-01-20 Thread Peter Bruin
Hello, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote: > Our current polynomial implementation has severe issues: > > - Our speed for GF(2^e)[x] is abysmal. > > - For other cases we are probably not linking to the currently fastest > libraries. > > - We don't have multi-point evaluation or

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for GSoC project: Polynomials - Rewriting and relinking

2017-01-20 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 11:03:52 AM UTC+1, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote: > > Hi sage-devel, > > Our current polynomial implementation has severe issues: > > - Our speed for GF(2^e)[x] is abysmal. > > - For other cases we are probably not linking to the currently fastest >